Is appointing court leave required to sue a liquidator? Commercial Law Association lunchtime seminar - 12 March 2021, State Library of NSW


In November 2020, the NSW Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal seeking to overturn a decision prohibiting the applicants from commencing proceedings against a Court-appointed liquidator personally (Aardwolf Industries LLC v Tayeh [2020] NSWCA 301 (‘Aardwolf’)). Despite that it was commonly agreed leave of the appointing Court was necessary, Leeming JA questioned whether this was in fact correct, making in obiter remarks ‘lest they be overlooked in later cases’.

Having published a paper in 2011 suggesting the requirement of appointing Court leave is both outdated and outmoded, in this seminar Dr John Azzi re-examines the origin and rationale for the procedural requirement of leave. He finds it is neither necessary nor maintainable given the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), which is designed to promote efficiency and cover the field by ensuring any person aggrieved can commence proceedings against a liquidator personally without first obtaining leave from either the appointing Court or any other Court.

The session will be chaired by Dr Robert Austin, Level 22 Chambers.

This Commercial Law Association lunchtime seminar will be held from 12.30pm-2.00pm on Friday 12 March 2021 at the Dixon Room, Mitchell Wing, State Library of NSW.

Further details and registration are available here.

If you no longer wish to receive In Brief, please notify the Bar Association's

To top